T
traeai
Sign in
返回首页
Gary Marcus(@GaryMarcus)

When you think about it SpaceX has cumulatively lost a lot less than OpenAI so maybe it’s a bargain?... or maybe we just shouldn’t value companies at a trillion dollars until they actually show evidence of consistent profitability? silly me.

7.5Score
When you think about it SpaceX has cumulatively lost a lot less than OpenAI so maybe it’s a bargain?... or maybe we just shouldn’t value companies at a trillion dollars until they actually show evidence of consistent profitability? silly me.

TL;DR · AI Summary

Gary Marcus discusses the financial performance of SpaceX and OpenAI and questions the reasonableness of high valuations for companies.

Key Takeaways

  • SpaceX has lost $13B since 2023 and #WallStreet is still pricing the IPO at $1 T
  • Economist Dean Baker believes this high valuation is unreasonable.
  • Marcus argues that companies should not be valued at trillions of dollars unless

Outline

Jump quickly between sections.

  1. Gary Marcus raises thoughts on the financial performance of SpaceX and OpenAI.

  2. SpaceX has lost $13B since 2023.

  3. OpenAI has also experienced losses in recent years.

  4. #WallStreet continues to price the IPO at $1 TRILLION.

  5. Dean Baker believes this high valuation is unreasonable.

  6. Companies should not be valued at trillions of dollars without evidence of consistent profitability.

Mindmap

See how the topics connect at a glance.

查看大纲文本(无障碍 / 无 JS 友好)
  • SpaceX vs OpenAI 财务估值
    • SpaceX 财务状况
      • 累计亏损 130 亿美元
      • 上市估值 1 万亿美元
    • OpenAI 财务状况
      • 过去几年亏损
    • 市场反应
      • WallStreet 上市定价 1 万亿美元
    • 经济学家观点
      • 高估值不合理
    • Marcus 观点
      • 不应高估无盈利公司

Highlights

Key sentences worth saving and sharing.

  • SpaceX has lost $13B since 2023 and #WallStreet is still pricing the IPO at $1 TRILLION. Though a mere economist, @deanbaker13 says the math isn't adding up. cepr.net/publications/w

    Paragraph 2

    ⬇︎ 下载 PNG𝕏 分享到 X
  • Economist Dean Baker believes this high valuation is unreasonable.

    Paragraph 4

    ⬇︎ 下载 PNG𝕏 分享到 X
  • Marcus argues that companies should not be valued at trillions of dollars without evidence of consistent profitability.

    Paragraph 6

    ⬇︎ 下载 PNG𝕏 分享到 X
#SpaceX#OpenAI#valuation#profit
Open original article

Don’t miss what’s happening

When you think about it, SpaceX has cumulatively lost a lot less than OpenAI, so maybe it’s a bargain? Or maybe we just shouldn’t value companies at a trillion dollars until they actually show evidence of consistent profitability? Silly me.

Quote

CEPR

@ceprdc

11h

SpaceX has lost $13B since 2023 and #WallStreet is still pricing the IPO at $1 TRILLION. Though a mere economist, @deanbaker13 says the math isn't adding up. cepr.net/publications/w

Image 1: Image

AI may generate inaccurate information. Please verify important content.