E237｜央视和FIFA谈判纷争背后，体育赛事转播权的博弈与生意
Listen
问这期播客
会先在本集摘要、章节、转录和笔记里找答案。
TL;DR · AI Summary
央视与FIFA围绕世界杯转播权的谈判揭示了体育赛事版权生意的商业模式变迁，中国被FIFA列为版权价格第一梯队，从2002到2026年版权费上涨20倍，赛事转播变现面临新挑战。
Key Takeaways
- 世界杯转播权从2002到2026年对中国要价上涨20倍，中国被列为版权价格第一梯队
- 体育赛事版权在中国经历过过山车式泡沫，源于十年前不计成本的恶性竞争
- 世界杯和奥运会可能是中国市场仅有的稳赚不赔的体育版权，抖音等平台正探索边解说边直播带货新模式
Outline
Jump quickly between sections.
央视与FIFA就美加墨世界杯转播权的谈判过程与最终达成协议的细节。
FIFA在谈判中做出让步，将单独售卖的女子世界杯打包进入交易协议中。
联想等中国赞助商在谈判中的协调作用及其背后动力。
FIFA对世界杯转播权的定价策略及中国市场的特殊地位。
中国被FIFA设定为版权价格第一梯队的原因及定价机制。
从2002年到2026年，FIFA对央视的版权要价上涨了20倍的历程。
全球及中国体育赛事版权市场的发展变化与趋势。
十年前中国体育版权市场的泡沫形成与破裂过程。
Mindmap
See how the topics connect at a glance.
查看大纲文本（无障碍 / 无 JS 友好）
- 体育赛事转播权的博弈
- 央视与FIFA谈判
- 赞助商的协调作用
- 女子世界杯打包进入
- 世界杯定价逻辑
- 中国为第一梯队
- 20年价格上涨20倍
- 体育版权生意变迁
- 中国版权泡沫
- 新商业模式探索
Highlights
Key sentences worth saving and sharing.
从02年到26年，FIFA对央视的版权要价涨了20倍
2022年世界杯，央视入账了50亿
十年前中国的版权泡沫，源于不计成本的恶性竞争
中国版权生意难做，稳赚不赔的可能只有世界杯和奥运会
抖音和快手，正在尝试边解说比赛边直播带货
Chapters
价格细节：打包的版权交易里，很少透露单届的价格
价格细节：打包的版权交易里，很少透露单届的价格
FIFA的让步，单独售卖的女子世界杯，也被打包进来了
FIFA的让步，单独售卖的女子世界杯，也被打包进来了
联想出面协调，背后动力是什么
联想出面协调，背后动力是什么
谈判纷争的惯常套路，最终双方都会让步到促成交易
谈判纷争的惯常套路，最终双方都会让步到促成交易
从18年到26年，世界杯的中国赞助商为什么在变少
从18年到26年，世界杯的中国赞助商为什么在变少
赞助世界杯，到底能给中国企业带来多少好处
赞助世界杯，到底能给中国企业带来多少好处
中国被FIFA设定到版权价格第一梯队，定价逻辑是什么？
中国被FIFA设定到版权价格第一梯队，定价逻辑是什么？
体育赛事版权谈判的流程、阶段和套路
体育赛事版权谈判的流程、阶段和套路
提前一个月转播权还没谈拢，这种情况经常发生
提前一个月转播权还没谈拢，这种情况经常发生
从02年到26年，FIFA对央视的版权要价涨了20倍
从02年到26年，FIFA对央视的版权要价涨了20倍
全球体育比赛的版权价格，都被转播方里的新玩家带起来了
全球体育比赛的版权价格，都被转播方里的新玩家带起来了
2022年世界杯，央视入账了50亿
2022年世界杯，央视入账了50亿
Transcript
价格细节打包的版权交易里，很少透露单届的价格
FIFA的让步，单独售卖的女子世界杯，也被打包进来了
联想出面协调，背后动力是什么
谈判纷争的惯常套路，最终双方都会让步到促成交易
从18年到26年，世界杯的中国赞助商为什么在变少
赞助世界杯，到底能给中国企业带来多少好处
中国被FIFA设定到版权价格第一梯队，定价逻辑是什么？
体育赛事版权谈判的流程、阶段和套路
提前一个月转播权还没谈拢，这种情况经常发生
从02年到26年，FIFA对央视的版权要价涨了20倍
全球体育比赛的版权价格，都被转播方里的新玩家带起来了
2022年世界杯，央视入账了50亿
转播方能赚多少，在FIFA面前并非秘密
全球范围内，大转播方的变现能力并没有变强
体育版权上亏钱的，可不止乐视体育
世界杯的转播权，为什么总是两届打包卖
赛事版权在中国，坐过速升速落的过山车
十年前中国的版权泡沫，源于不计成本的恶性竞争
对比国外版权市场，中国的同行打得太凶了
健康的版权生意，关键是要“量KPI为出”
中国版权生意难做，稳赚不赔的可能只有世界杯和奥运会
NFL、NBA和F1，为什么顶级赛事的版权都在疯涨
抖音和快手，正在尝试边解说比赛边直播带货
赛事版权的长期受益者，可能是优质IP持有方和去中心化的流量平台
Show notes
With just one month until the USA-Canada-Mexico World Cup begins, the copyright negotiations between CCTV and FIFA have finally been settled. In this episode, we discuss the pricing logic of the World Cup and the evolving landscape of sports broadcasting rights business.
【Host】
Mahua, Special Researcher at Silicon Valley 101
【Guests】
Zhu Xiaodong, CEO of Lizan Sports, Sales Consultant for Japan's broadcasting rights of this World Cup
Zhang Bin, Editor-in-Chief of "Sports Industry Independent Review"
【You Will Hear】
A False Alarm in Negotiations, Mediation by Sponsors
02:40 Price Details: In packaged copyright deals, single-event prices are rarely disclosed
04:25 FIFA's compromise: The separately sold Women's World Cup was also included in the package
05:28 Lenovo stepped in to mediate, what was the motivation behind it
08:31 The usual pattern of negotiation disputes: both sides eventually compromise to close the deal
09:47 Why are Chinese sponsors for the World Cup decreasing from 2018 to 2026
12:30 How much benefit can sponsoring the World Cup actually bring to Chinese companies
The Pricing Logic of the World Cup
14:41 China was placed by FIFA in the first tier for copyright pricing, what's the logic behind this?
19:00 The process, stages, and tactics of sports broadcasting rights negotiations
21:51 Broadcasting rights not settled one month before the event, this situation often occurs
22:36 From 2002 to 2026, FIFA's asking price for CCTV's broadcasting rights increased 20-fold
25:49 Global sports broadcasting rights prices have been driven up by new players in the broadcasting market
27:30 CCTV earned 5 billion from the 2022 World Cup
29:54 How much broadcasters can earn is no secret to FIFA
From China to the World: The Evolution of Sports Broadcasting Rights Business
33:14 Globally, the monetization capabilities of major broadcasters haven't strengthened
35:35 It's not just LeTV Sports that lost money on sports broadcasting rights
39:29 Why are World Cup broadcasting rights always sold as a package of two tournaments
41:31 Sports broadcasting rights in China have experienced a rapid rise and fall
45:35 China's copyright bubble a decade ago stemmed from cost-ignoring vicious competition
49:30 Compared to foreign copyright markets, Chinese competitors are too aggressive
51:42 A healthy copyright business needs to "measure KPIs against output"
53:09 Copyright business is difficult in China, with only the World Cup and Olympics likely to be safe bets
55:05 NFL, NBA, and F1: Why are broadcasting rights for top-tier events soaring
59:00 Douyin and Kuaishou are experimenting with live commentary while selling products during broadcasts
01:02:22 Long-term beneficiaries of sports rights may be quality IP holders and decentralized traffic platforms
【Further Reading and Related Terms】
Behind CCTV's World Cup Deal: FIFA Made Concessions, Lenovo Was the Key Mediator
World Cup Broadcasting Rights: Is a Turnaround Coming?
Migu: A digital content platform under China Mobile, holding exclusive rights to CSL, Premier League, Ligue 1, WTT, UFC, and broadcasting rights for NBA, Asian Cup, Thomas & Uber Cup, and other events.
Dentsu: A Japanese advertising and marketing company deeply involved in the sports industry, acting as a "super agent" in sports broadcasting rights, representing resources for World Cup, Olympics, and many other sports events in Japan and some Asian countries.
DAZN: A UK-based sports streaming giant launched in 2016 by Access Industries and Perform Group. With strong capital and operations covering over 200 countries and regions, it's one of the largest buyers in the global sports rights market, known as the "Netflix of Sports."
WTT: World Table Tennis, established by the International Table Tennis Federation in 2019 to promote the professionalization and commercialization of table tennis, operating a new event system including Grand Smashes and Championships.
China's Sports Broadcasting Rights Bubble: Around 2015, capital flooded into the sports industry. LeTV Sports spent 2.7 billion over two years for CSL new media rights, while PP Sports spent $720 million over three years for Premier League rights. As LeTV's capital chain broke, coupled with issues like undeveloped payment habits and rampant piracy, sports broadcasting rights prices in China returned to rational levels.
PP Sports: Formerly the video website PPTV, acquired by Suning in 2013. It was one of China's earliest internet sports streaming platforms, holding rights to over 50 events including Premier League, UEFA Champions League, and Serie A at its peak, but abandoned these rights one by one between 2020-2021 due to inability to pay fees.
New Sports: One of China's earliest sports rights giants, holding exclusive Premier League broadcasting rights in mainland China from 2010-2019 seasons. It pioneered the pay-per-view model in China in 2013 and formed a joint venture with iQiyi called New Ai Sports in 2018.
League Pass: NBA's official global streaming subscription service, supporting multi-game viewing, real-time player data overlays during games, and providing 24/7 NBA TV programming including game analysis and interviews in addition to live game broadcasts.
【Executive Producer】
Hongjun
【Post-Production】
Amei
【Operations】
Zhu Jie
【BGM】
Kick Off - Earle Belo
In a Minute - John Runefelt
Rumors About Us - T. Morri
All Parts Equal - Airae
Burn Away - Nyck Caution
【Find Us Here】
Official Account: Silicon Valley 101
Listening Platforms: Apple Podcast | Spotify | Xiaoyuzhou | Ximalaya | Qingting FM | Lizhi FM | NetEase Cloud Music | QQ Music
Other Platforms: YouTube | Bilibili Search "Silicon Valley 101 Podcast"
Contact Us: [podcast@sv101.net](mailto:podcast@sv101.net)
Special Guests: Zhang Bin and Zhu Xiaodong.