T
traeai
Sign in

traeai topic radar

Prompt Engineering、提示词模式与上下文工程

追踪 prompt engineering、context engineering、system prompt、few-shot、结构化输出、工具调用提示与提示词评测。

What searchers are trying to solve

想找到可复用的提示词模式,理解提示词和上下文组织如何影响模型输出。

Why this is worth tracking

即使模型能力提升,提示词和上下文仍是把模型变成可靠产品能力的关键设计层。

Prompt Engineering提示词工程context engineeringsystem promptfew-shot结构化输出prompt eval

长尾组合

这个专题可以沿着工具、实践、对比等搜索意图持续扩展,不靠空壳换词,而是用真实材料更新。

Prompt Engineering 工具Prompt Engineering 实践Prompt Engineering 对比提示词工程 工具提示词工程 实践提示词工程 对比context engineering 工具context engineering 实践

可自动化内容模块

精选材料

持续抓取与 Prompt Engineering 相关的高分文章、播客、视频和推文。

趋势判断

把最近变化、反复出现的观点和争议点整理成稳定摘要。

实体关联

自动连接相关公司、模型、产品、人物和概念,形成可继续深挖的入口。

Featured content

Filtered by relevance, score, and recency.

Search more
Simon Willison's Weblog 图标

GPT-5.5 prompting guide

Simon Willison's Weblog299 字 (约 2 分钟)
90

OpenAI 发布了 GPT-5.5 的提示工程指南,强调新模型需重新调优而非直接复用旧提示。

入选理由:GPT-5.5 需要从零开始优化提示,而非简单复用旧版本的配置。

FeaturedArticle#GPT-5.5#OpenAI#Prompt Engineering#AI英文
#543. Why 2026 is the Year of Harness? Deep Dive by IBM Expert

#543. Why 2026 is the Year of Harness? Deep Dive by IBM Expert

跨国串门儿计划1189 字 (约 5 分钟)
88

2026 will be the year of AI Harness. Using engineering methods like guardrails, validation, and automation processors, unreliable AI Agents can be transformed into stable, controllable systems without modifying Prompts, marking key infrastructure for AGI.

入选理由:AI Harness consists of five core components: tool registration, context compress

FeaturedPodcast#AI Agent#Harness#IBM#Prompt Engineering#RAG中文
Prompt Engineering for Agentic AI

Prompt Engineering for Agentic AI

Machine Learning Mastery4533 字 (约 19 分钟)
87

In agentic AI systems, prompt engineering has evolved into context engineering: reliable behavior requires deliberate design of four components—system prompt, tools, examples, and context state management—otherwise, context rot causes behavioral drift across multi-step reasoning, as identified by Anthropic's research.

入选理由:Agentic prompts require four components: system prompt, tool definitions, exampl

FeaturedArticle#Agentic AI#Prompt Engineering#Context Engineering#Anthropic#LLM英文
🔬Doing Vibe Physics — Alex Lupsasca, OpenAI

🔬Doing Vibe Physics — Alex Lupsasca, OpenAI

Latent Space1542 字 (约 7 分钟)
87

Alex Lupsasca of OpenAI demonstrates that GPT-5 series models have achieved breakthrough scientific reasoning, reproducing his months-long theoretical physics paper in just 11 minutes — signaling AI’s transformation of fundamental scientific discovery.

入选理由:GPT-5 can reproduce a theoretical physicist’s months-long paper in 11 minutes —

FeaturedArticle#AI for Science#GPT-5#Theoretical Physics#Prompt Engineering#OpenAI英文
Simon Willison's Weblog 图标

Changes in the system prompt between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7

Simon Willison's Weblog1305 字 (约 6 分钟)
87

Anthropic 在 Claude Opus 4.7 系统提示中新增儿童安全标签、工具搜索机制,并优化交互逻辑以减少冗长和侵扰性行为。

入选理由:新增 <critical_child_safety_instructions> 标签,强化儿童安全策略

FeaturedArticle#Claude#AI系统提示#大模型#Anthropic#Agent设计英文
UX Magazine 图标

AI体验设计正从提示工程转向约束优先架构,以解决大模型幻觉与可信度问题。

入选理由:提示仅能引导风格,无法保证事实准确性或防止幻觉。

FeaturedArticle#AI体验设计#大语言模型#人机交互#约束优先#Prompt Engineering英文
Prompt engineering by Quick component: Patterns and pitfalls

Prompt engineering by Quick component: Patterns and pitfalls

AWS Machine Learning Blog2545 字 (约 11 分钟)
85

AWS官方博客详解Quick组件提示工程实践,揭示精准目标定义、数据源筛选等关键技巧,避免常见陷阱。

入选理由:Quick Research需明确目标受众与时间范围,可提升报告实用性

FeaturedArticle#Prompt Engineering#AWS Quick#AI#机器学习英文
Prompt engineering fundamentals for Amazon Quick

Prompt engineering fundamentals for Amazon Quick

AWS Machine Learning Blog2194 字 (约 9 分钟)
85

明确的提示结构能显著提升Amazon Quick的AI功能输出质量,本文系统阐述了提示工程的核心原则与框架。

入选理由:具体化指标、时间范围和分析类型可提升30%以上结果准确性

FeaturedArticle#Prompt Engineering#Amazon Quick#AI#AWS#机器学习中英混合
Jev for beginners: how to use it and what to build

Jev for beginners: how to use it and what to build

Lenny's Newsletter698 字 (约 3 分钟)
85

Jev是TypeSafe AI的新型决策模型,通过类型安全的结构化输出实现低成本高效分类,已成功应用于PR分类、Gmail处理等场景,单次调用成本仅4美分。

入选理由:Jev返回类型安全的结构化值(选择/评分/概率),成本为4美分/百万输入标记

FeaturedArticle#Jev#TypeSafe AI#AI模型#工程实践英文
Can Jev replace your LLM judge? Evaluating quality, cost, and latency

Can Jev replace your LLM judge? Evaluating quality, cost, and latency

MLflow Blog1503 字 (约 7 分钟)
85

Jev通过结构化输出实现更低延迟和成本,但无法替代LLM judge的解释能力,在技术问答评估中表现优异。

入选理由:Jev的结构化输出使成本降至$0.042/百万输入token,比传统LLM低50%以上

FeaturedArticle#Jev#LLM judge#MLflow#模型评估#TypeSafe英文
Towards Data Science 图标

A New Kind of Model for AI Decision-Making?

Towards Data Science1811 字 (约 8 分钟)
85

TypeSafe.AI的System One模型Jev通过结构化输出和RLCD训练法,在决策类任务中优于传统LLM,尤其适合意图分类场景。

入选理由:System One模型使用RLCD训练法,输出决策+概率,避免LLM的幻觉问题

FeaturedArticle#AI决策模型#TypeSafe.AI#RLCD#意图分类#System One英文

Related topics

跨材料问答 · Prompt Engineering、提示词模式与上下文工程

回答基于:Prompt Engineering、提示词模式与上下文工程 专题下 12 条材料
    0 / 500

    AI may generate inaccurate information. Please verify important content.