Does paying 5x more per page actually get you better document extraction? We ran the data to find ou...
TL;DR · AI 摘要
高成本不等于高准确性，LlamaIndex实验显示Agentic Plus在成本仅为竞品1/3时达到最高文档提取准确率。
核心要点
- 14个系统在370份企业文档测试中，成本与准确性无显著正相关
- Agentic Plus以<1/3成本超越其他系统
- Agentic & Cost Effective系列系统多次击败数倍成本的竞品
结构提纲
按章节快速跳转。
- §研究背景
探讨文档提取成本与准确性的关系，质疑高价是否带来更好效果
- ·实验方法
评估14个前沿系统在370份企业文档上的表现，对比成本与准确性
- ›核心发现
高成本系统未必然带来更高准确性，Agentic Plus性价比突出
- ·结论
成本与准确性无直接正相关，需综合评估系统性能
思维导图
用一张图看清主题之间的关系。
查看大纲文本（无障碍 / 无 JS 友好）
- 文档提取成本与准确性分析
- 实验方法
- 14系统测试370文档
- 核心发现
- Agentic Plus高性价比
- 成本与准确性无正相关
- 结论
- 需综合评估系统性能
金句 / Highlights
值得收藏与分享的关键句。
Agentic Plus在成本仅为runner-up 1/3时达到最高准确率
14个系统在370份企业文档测试中，成本与准确性无显著正相关
Agentic & Cost Effective系列系统多次击败数倍成本的竞品
LlamaIndex 🦙 on X: "Does paying 5x more per page actually get you better document extraction? We ran the data to find out. We evaluated 14 frontier systems across 370 enterprise documents, then plotted their accuracy against cost per page. The biggest takeaway? Higher cost does not equal better e… / X
@llama_index
Does paying 5x more per page actually get you better document extraction? We ran the data to find out. We evaluated 14 frontier systems across 370 enterprise documents, then plotted their accuracy against cost per page. The biggest takeaway? Higher cost does not equal better extraction. • Agentic Plus hit the highest accuracy overall at <1/3 the cost of the runner-up. • Agentic & Cost Effective routinely beat systems costing several times more per page. More expensive doesn’t necessarily mean more accurate. Now we have the data to show it. Try Extract on your own documents with 10,000 free credits when you sign up for LlamaParse →
cloud.llamaindex.ai/?utm_medium=so…
4:43 PM · Sep 4, 2026
14.6K
Views
8
4
25
11