๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ-๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ...

TL;DR ยท AI ๆ่ฆ
Milvus on X: "๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ-๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐น๐. ๐ช๐ฒ ๐ฏ...
ๆ ธๅฟ่ฆ็น
- ไธป้ข่็ฆ๏ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ-๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ
- ๆฅๆบ๏ผMilvus(@milvusio)๏ผๅปบ่ฎฎ็ปๅๅๆๅคๆญ็ป่ใ
- AI ๅๆๆไธๅฏ็จ๏ผๆฌๆกไธบไฟๅบ่ฏๅไธๆ่ฆใ
Milvus on X: "๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ-๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐น๐. ๐ช๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป-๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐น https://t.co/Ju3EpeVlai" / X
Milvus
@milvusio
๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ-๐๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ฟ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐น๐. ๐ช๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป-๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐น ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ ~๐ฐ๐ฌ%. Grep-style code retrieval has drawn plenty of community discussion. For pure recall, literal matching gets the job done. But in a large codebase, it forces the model to wade through massive amounts of irrelevant code to find the few lines that matter. ๐ง๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ: โข ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐น๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฑ. Large repos produce hundreds of literal matches for common terms. Most are noise, but they all consume tokens and inference time. โข ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐. Grep matches characters, not meaning. compute_final_cost() and calculate_total_price() do the same thing, but a string match won't connect them. โข ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐. Line-level matches strip away the surrounding class and method structure. The model compensates by reading more files, burning more tokens. ๐ช๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป-๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐. ๐๐ ๐ต๐ถ๐ #๐ญ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐๐๐๐ฏ'๐ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐น๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ญ๐ฎ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐. ๐๐ป ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ, ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ ~๐ฐ๐ฌ% ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐พ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐. It's a code retrieval MCP server that integrates a vector database and embedding model into the search layer. It plugs into Claude Code and is also compatible with Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, Cline, Cursor, Windsurf, and other MCP-compatible agents. ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐น๐: โข ๐ฆ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด. Vector similarity ranks code by relevance, surfacing the most related results first instead of every literal match. โข ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด. Dense retrieval can match conceptually related code even when function names differ entirely. โข ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐-๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐น. Results are chunked around complete syntactic units (functions, classes, methods), giving the model enough structural context to reason about behavior. Under the hood, Claude Context uses MCP as its interface layer and Milvus for codebase indexing and hybrid search (BM25 + dense vectors). Embeddings support OpenAI, VoyageAI (which ships a code-specific model), and Ollama for local deployment when privacy matters. Code chunking uses AST parsing by default, splitting along semantic boundaries instead of cutting at arbitrary line counts. For files AST can't parse, LangChain's text splitter handles the fallback. For incremental updates, Claude Context uses Merkle-tree change detection. If the root hash hasn't changed, the index stays untouched. When it changes, the system identifies exactly which files were modified and re-embeds only those. Change one function, and you don't re-index the entire project. ๐
github.com/zilliztech/claโฆ
๐ Full benchmark and architecture:
milvus.io/blog/claude-coโฆ
3:30 PM ยท Jul 15, 2026
503
Views
4
9
8