Recently, DeepSeek-V4 Pro feels really good—especially because it’s cheap!
TL;DR · AI Summary
DeepSeek-V4 Pro is praised for cost-effectiveness in small tasks like code review and writing, replacing expensive Qwen-Max; current primary model ranking: GPT-5.5 > Claude 4.7 > DeepSeek-V4 Pro.
Key Takeaways
- DeepSeek-V4 Pro performs well on small tasks (e.g., review, writing) at signific
- User’s current primary model ranking: GPT-5.5, Claude 4.7, DeepSeek-V4 Pro
- This is anecdotal feedback without quantitative metrics or controlled comparison
Mindmap
See how the topics connect at a glance.
查看大纲文本（无障碍 / 无 JS 友好）
- 用户对DeepSeek-V4 Pro的主观评价
- 优势
- 价格低廉
- 小任务效果好（review/写作）
- 对比对象
- Qwen-Max（贵）
- GPT-5.5（主力第一）
- Claude 4.7（主力第二）
Highlights
Key sentences worth saving and sharing.
DeepSeek-V4 Pro is really good—and crucially, cheap. For small tasks like review and writing, it delivers solid results.
Previously used Qwen-Max, which was very expensive; now the main stack is GPT-5.5, Claude 4.7, and DeepSeek-V4 Pro.
Here is the translation of the given Markdown content:
.title: Viking on X: "最近觉得Deepseek v4 pro真的挺好用的 关键是便宜ah 现在给他一些小任务 review以及写作的工作完成的都不错 之前一直用qwen max 真的好贵 现我的主力排序是 gpt 5.5 claude 4.7 以及Deepseek v4 pro了" / X
MD5 Content:
Viking: <https://x.com/vikingmutations>]
Viking mute: <https://x.com/vikingmutations>]
最近觉得Deepseek v4 pro is great because it is cheap. Now he gives some small tasks to review and write work that are completed.之前 always used qwen max, which is expensive. Now my primary sequence is gpt 5.5, claude 4.7, and Deepseek v4 pro.
[6,458 Views](https://x.com/vikingmutations ANalytics)