普林斯顿大学强制实施监考制度，打破133年历史传统
TL;DR · AI 摘要
普林斯顿大学强制实施监考制度，打破133年的传统。
核心要点
- 普林斯顿大学引入监考制度
- 打破133年历史传统
- 可能影响考试公平性
结构提纲
按章节快速跳转。
思维导图
用一张图看清主题之间的关系。
查看大纲文本（无障碍 / 无 JS 友好）
- 普林斯顿大学监考制度
- 背景
- 政策
- 影响
- 讨论
- 未来
金句 / Highlights
值得收藏与分享的关键句。
普林斯顿大学长期以来没有监考制度，此次政策出台打破了133年的传统。
Princeton 教职员工强制执行监考，颠覆了 133 年的惯例 - The Princetonian
#### Previous Issues
#### Submit a tip
[](https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent#)
教授强制监考，颠覆普林斯顿133年的惯例
##### 教授们在周一的教员会议上聚集庆祝退休后通过一项政策强制监考的教授，该政策要求在教员会议上外的考试期间进行监考，5月11日。
###### Luke Grippo / The Daily Princetonian
普林斯顿大学教授强制监考考试，颠覆了133年来的惯例。
May 11, 2026 | 6:31pm EDT
- [](http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent)
- [](http://x.com/intent/post?url=https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent&text=Princeton%20faculty%20mandate%20proctoring%20for%20in-person%20exams,%20upending%20133%20years%20of%20precedent)
- [](mailto:?subject=Princeton%20faculty%20mandate%20proctoring%20for%20in-person%20examinations%2C%20upending%20133%20years%20of%20precedent%20%20|%20The%20Daily%20Princetonian&message=Check%20out%20this%20article%20from%20The%20Daily%20Princetonian%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailyprincetonian.com%2Farticle%2F2026%2F05%2Fprinceton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent)
- [](https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-news-adpol-proctoring-in-person-examinations-passed-faculty-133-years-precedent#)
All in-person examinations at Princeton will be proctored starting July 1, representing the most significant change to the honor system since it was established in 1893. The faculty passed a proposal requiring instructor supervision at Monday’s faculty meeting, with one opposing vote.
The historic vote was the culmination of months of deliberation within the administration and student governing bodies about how to address increasing concerns over academic integrity violations, including the proliferation of AI usage. The proposal cleared a full faculty vote as the final of three required rounds of approval, having already been passed unanimously by the Committee on Examinations and Standing and the Faculty Advisory Committee on Policy.
The policy proposal, previously sent by Dean of the College Michael Gordin to the Faculty Advisory Committee and included in Monday’s meeting notes, states that instructors will remain present in exam rooms “as a witness to what happens,” but are instructed not to interfere with students. If a suspected Honor Code violation occurs, proctors will document their observations and submit a report to the student-run Honor Committee, where they may later testify under the same standards used for other witnesses.
The proposal notes that additional details, including proctor-to-student ratios and guidelines regarding monitoring practices, will be finalized in consultation with faculty and student representatives before the policy takes effect.
Princeton’s honor system dates back to 1893, when the faculty first instituted the Honor Code following a student petition to eliminate proctoring during examinations. Since then, the honor system has relied on individual accountability, with students pledging both to refrain from academic dishonesty and to report those they witness in violation.
ADVERTISEMENT
Following the Honor Code’s original implementation, proctoring was explicitly banned in the Rules and Procedures of the Faculty and the Rights, Rules, Responsibilities of the University, which remained in effect for 133 years up until Monday’s vote.
The policy proposal cites AI and personal electronic devices as major catalysts behind the policy shift. "The ease of access of these [AI] tools on a small personal device have also changed the external appearance of misconduct during an examination," it reads, making cheating "much harder for other students to observe (and hence to report)."
The proposal also points to a growing reluctance among students to report peers directly. The proposal claims that anonymous reporting of allegations has increased in recent years, fueled by fears of "doxxing or shaming among their peer groups" online.
Support nonprofit student journalism. Donate to the ‘Prince.’ Donate now »
In The Daily Princetonian’s 2025 Senior Survey of over 500 seniors, 29.9 percent of respondents reported that they had cheated on an assignment or exam during their time at Princeton. 44.6 percent of senior respondents reported knowledge of Honor Code violations that they chose not to report. Only 0.4 percent of seniors responded saying that they had reported a peer for an Honor Code violation.
An Undergraduate Student Government survey of students cited in the proposal reportedly found that “a majority would favor proctoring or are indifferent to any change,” though a “sizeable minority opposes it on the grounds that students should behave honorably, and that faculty and students should trust each other given the 1893 Honor Code compact.”
Similarly, students and faculty previously interviewed by the ‘Prince’ expressed divided views on the policy’s implementation. Some cited the inadequacy of the current student reporting model, while others said the introduction of proctors could erode the trust that defines Princeton’s academic culture.
历史性变革紧随十一月政策变更之后，该政策要求所有单独和小规模考试均需安排监考，包括补考、学生运动员旅行期间参加的考试以及有残疾辅助的考试。
荣誉委员会主席艾玛·麦库克（Nadia Makuc ’26）在三月发表于《王子》的一篇专栏中写道，荣誉委员会长期以来一直在讨论引入监考作为考试房间中的额外见证人和报告者，并认为现在是采取这一措施的时候了。
“荣誉委员会经历了新的压力点，包括过去一年案件数量的增长以及诸如生成式AI等挑战，学生的感受也认识到其程序需要更好地反映当前对学术诚信的挑战。”麦库克写道。
订阅《王子》的最佳内容，享受上门或电子邮件送达。立即订阅 »
荣誉委员会听证会是涉及涉嫌违反荣誉准则的潜在违规行为的保密且由学生主导的程序。被指控的学生可以提出辩护，传唤证人，并由同伴代表协助。如果学生被认定违反了荣誉准则，则可施加的最大处罚是开除学籍。
威廉·艾普利（William Aepli ’26），前荣誉委员会同伴代表组织的共同主席，曾告诉《王子》，他的组织可能会看到荣誉委员会听证会中呈现证据类型的变化。
无需更改荣誉委员会章程和荣誉准则本身即可实施监考。根据提议，格登（Gordin）此前已确认，仅需更新教职员工规则与程序和权利、规则与责任部分。
提议指出，先前禁止监考的教职员工规则与程序部分将用要求教师监督现场考试的语言替换，而权利、规则与责任部分将在新学年开始前进行一次修订。
提议称，格登与现任及前任荣誉委员会主席、本科生院院长办公室同事、麦克格雷中心教学与学习部同事、纪律委员会成员以及本科生政府学术主任进行了会议并获得了支持。
“本科生和教师理解，监考人员的监督并不能消除作弊行为，”提议指出。“然而，他们相信这将产生显著的威慑效果，并且在学生自己完成考试时增加一个房间内的见证人将有助于减轻学生注意到并报告问题的压力。”
多位教师在会议后拒绝就新政策发表评论。英语和戏剧教授吉尔·多兰（Jill Dolan）曾在2015年至2024年间担任学院院长，她在与《王子》的采访中简要讨论了这一变化。
“我认为这是个遗憾，但这是必要的，”多兰说。“但我也理解它为何通过。我认为我们需要在当今时代采用不同的做法，但这确实标志着一个时刻。”
支持非营利学生新闻报道。捐赠给《王子》。立即捐赠 »
更多阅读：
[男子篮球队运营总监克里斯·蒙吉利亚即将离职，离开十年的教练团队](https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-sports-news-directors-basketball-operations-chris-mongilia-depart-mens-basketball-staff-2026)
[男子篮球队运营总监克里斯·蒙吉利亚即将离职，离开十年的教练团队](https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2026/05/princeton-sports-news-directors-basketball-operations-chris-mongilia-depart-mens-basketball-staff-2026)
哈伊克·耶尼巴罗夫 除了男子篮球队主教练迈克尔·亨德森（Mitch Henderson ’98），蒙吉利亚也是2023年老虎队奇迹般的十强赛队伍中最后一位成员。
历史上的今天：两座建筑的百年故事
历史上的今天：两座建筑的百年故事
Yi (Chris) Xin 在过去的一百年里，位于威廉街与华盛顿路交叉口的两座建筑从自然科学的实验室和教室转变为人文和社会科学的中心。今日，《王子》杂志回顾了绿厅和朱利斯·罗莫·拉宾诺维茨建筑的建造和演变背后的故事。
在过去的一百年里，位于威廉街与华盛顿路交叉口的两座建筑从自然科学的实验室和教室转变为人文和社会科学的中心。今日，《王子》杂志回顾了绿厅和朱利斯·罗莫·拉宾诺维茨建筑的建造和演变背后的故事。
1天前
深度解析：与Resistencia同行
深度解析：与Resistencia同行
Sena Chang 和 Devon Rudolph 《王子》杂志随Rachael Schnurr和Maral Sahebjame一同参加了Resistencia en Acción NJ成员的一次晨间巡逻。在这次巡逻中，志愿者们在社区内留意ICE执法人员的身影。
《王子》杂志随Rachael Schnurr和Maral Sahebjame一同参加了Resistencia en Acción NJ成员的一次晨间巡逻。在这次巡逻中，志愿者们在社区内留意ICE执法人员的身影。
1天前
热门文章
普林斯顿教授强制进行监考，颠覆了133年的惯例
普林斯顿Canvas服务恢复运行，因数据泄露引起的中断
普林斯顿免于缴纳捐赠税，PRINCO执行官称此举可节省数亿资金
新泽西州两名居民可能暴露于汉坦病毒，当局称风险水平仍较低
五次最长的《危险边缘》连胜后，Jamie Ding ’13重新聚焦住房问题
- [](https://x.com/princetonian)
- [](https://www.facebook.com/DailyPrincetonian)
- [](https://www.instagram.com/dailyprincetonian/)
- [](https://www.tiktok.com/@thedailyprincetonian)
- [](https://youtube.com/channel/UC6DZuLRHcb2Nf6bP3nna9VQ)
- [](https://open.spotify.com/show/5xeaopGvoY0teJn0atpNPM)
- [](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/channel/the-prince-on-air/id6442569865)
- [](https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/plugin/feeds/all.xml)
© 2026 普林斯顿日报
由SNworks解决方案提供支持