Are private AI companies undervalued right now?

- GenAI公司增长速度是SaaS公司的2倍以上
- AI公司估值未完全反映其超高速增长潜力
- 投资者不应过于关注价格,创始人应争取更高估值
Are private AI companies undervalued right now?

[AI Musings by Mu](http://kelvinmu.substack.com/)
Subscribe Sign in

Discover more from AI Musings by Mu
I write interesting things about technology, AI, and startups.
Over 1,000 subscribers
Subscribe
By subscribing, you agree Substack's Terms of Use, and acknowledge its Information Collection Notice and Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign in
Are private AI companies undervalued right now?

Aug 07, 2025
4
1
Share
Here’s a hot contrarian take: AI companies are massively undervalued right now...
One way to see this is by comparing today’s top breakout GenAI companies with the breakout SaaS companies of the past decade. (see table below)

Let’s take a look at the median Revenue Multiples:
GenAI: 42x
SaaS: 33x
Sure, GenAI companies are valued ~26% higher.
But multiples alone don’t tell the full story. Let’s take a look at the growth rates:
📈 Median y/y Growth:
GenAI: 7x
SaaS: 3x
Ah, so GenAI companies are growing more than 2x faster.
When you normalize for growth by taking the revenue-to-growth multiples (think PEG ratio for the finance nerds), GenAI comes out 50% cheaper:
Median Revenue-to-Growth Multiple:
GenAI: 5.9x
SaaS: 11.1x
AI companies are not getting a valuation bump simply because they have "AI" in them. The bump exists because of the extraordinary growth profile of these companies. And based on this table, one can argue that bump isn't nearly high enough.
Simply put, there is no precedent for the hypergrowth we’re seeing right now:
Not in the SaaS cycle.
Not in the internet and mobile cycle.
Not in any other tech cycles.
So what does this means for investors and founders?
💸 As an investor - This is not the time to nickel-and-dime. The traditional rules don’t apply in a hypergrowth cycle like this. You can’t afford to be too price-sensitive if it's the right company.
🚀 As a founder - If your metrics are breaking records, your valuation should too. Don’t sell yourself short. Look beyond simply revenue multiples. You may not be overvalued, just way ahead of the curve.
- * *
#### Subscribe to AI Musings by Mu
By Kelvin Mu · Launched 2 years ago
I write interesting things about technology, AI, and startups.
Subscribe
By subscribing, you agree Substack's Terms of Use, and acknowledge its Information Collection Notice and Privacy Policy.

[](https://substack.com/note/p-170373838/restacks?utm_source=substack&utm_content=facepile-restacks)
4
1
Share
#### Discussion about this post
Comments Restacks


[Aug 7, 2025](https://kelvinmu.substack.com/p/are-private-ai-companies-undervalued/comment/143112416 "Aug 7, 2025, 4:34 PM")
Hi Kevin - good stuff. Have you tried to run this math with gross margin factored in? My rough sense is that the GM for SaaS is around 80% and 40% for GenAI (OAI/Anthropic on high end of 50-60%, and inference platform and coding on the lower end of ~20%). If you apply the GM to the math, you will basically have those two category on parity. Any thoughts?
[Like (1)](javascript:void(0))ReplyShare
Top Latest Discussions
2024 Backward Pass: The Definitive Guide to AI in 2024
Your ultimate recap of AI for 2024
Dec 3, 2024•Kelvin Mu
30
2
3

AI: Are we in another dot-com bubble?
Jul 23, 2024•Kelvin Mu
25
4
3

>$5m ARR | 5x y/y growth | formed after 2020
May 19, 2025•Kelvin Mu
11
1
3

See all
Ready for more?
Subscribe
© 2026 Kelvin Mu · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture