Someone just asked me “What I don’t get is why you see it as some kind of failure that AI labs are n...
TL;DR · AI 摘要
Gary Marcus认为AI实验室使用神经符号工具是成功而非失败，这是他过去30年来的观点。
核心要点
- Gary Marcus认为神经符号工具是AI解决方案的一部分。
- 他声称这一趋势是对过去30年观点的验证。
- 人们最终会忘记反对这一观点的历史。
结构提纲
按章节快速跳转。
思维导图
用一张图看清主题之间的关系。
查看大纲文本（无障碍 / 无 JS 友好）
- Gary Marcus的观点
金句 / Highlights
值得收藏与分享的关键句。
Gary Marcus认为神经符号工具是AI解决方案的一部分。
他声称这一趋势是对过去30年观点的验证。
人们最终会忘记反对这一观点的历史。
I don’t! As I argued in my newsletter on Claude Code (entitled “The biggest advance in AI since the LLM”) and in earlier piece o3" / X
Gary Marcus, MIT PhD and NYU Professor Emeritus on X: "Someone just asked me “What I don’t get is why you see it as some kind of failure that AI labs are now using harnesses and neurosymbolic tools…?” I don’t! As I argued in my newsletter on Claude Code (entitled “The biggest advance in AI since the LLM”) and in earlier piece o3" / X
Don’t miss what’s happening
Gary Marcus, MIT PhD and NYU Professor Emeritus
Someone just asked me “What I don’t get is why you see it as some kind of failure that AI labs are now using harnesses and neurosymbolic tools…?” I don’t! As I argued in my newsletter on Claude Code (entitled “The biggest advance in AI since the LLM”) and in earlier piece o3 and grok 4, I see this trend as absolute vindication for what I have been arguing for the last 30 years - that neurosymbolic tools have to be part of the solution. People will soon forget that they ever argued otherwise, but they did, right here, for a decade. 
·
14
3
44
8
Read 14 replies