I think I wrote exactly that, and it is still right. Organizations are a form of narrow superintelligence. My university, or Walmart, can do things that a human cannot, often using complex processes no one designed explicitly.

I will go further: the failure to deeply consider how to make AI work together with existing organizational superintelligences is a big reason why we have not yet seen any large impact of AI on scientific discovery or economic productivity despite high levels of AI ability.

Ethan Mollick(@emollick)

Ethan Mollick(@emollick)2026年10月8日

I think I wrote exactly that, and it is still right. Organizations are a form of narrow superintelligence. My university, or Walmart, can do things that a human cannot, often using complex processes no one designed explicitly. I will go further: the failure to deeply consider how to make AI work together with existing organizational superintelligences is a big reason why we have not yet seen any large impact of AI on scientific discovery or economic productivity despite high levels of AI ability.

6.6内容质量

TL;DR · AI 摘要

Ethan Mollick on X: "I think I wrote exactly that, and it is still right. Organizations are a form of narrow superintell...

核心要点

主题聚焦：I think I wrote exactly that, and it is still ri
来源：Ethan Mollick(@emollick)，建议结合原文判断细节。
AI 分析暂不可用，本条为保底评分与摘要。

#AI#产品

打开原文

Ethan Mollick 在 X 上的推文："我想我确实写过类似的内容，现在依然正确。组织是一种狭义超级智能的形式。我的大学，或者沃尔玛，能够完成人类无法做到的事情，通常依靠着复杂的过程，而这些过程并非由任何人明确设计。我将进一步指出：未能深入思考如何让 AI 与现有的组织超级智能协同工作，正是我们至今尚未看到 AI 对科学研究或经济生产力产生重大影响的主要原因。"

Ethan Mollick @emollick

我想我确实写过类似的内容，现在依然正确。组织是一种狭义超级智能的形式。我的大学，或者沃尔玛，能够完成人类无法做到的事情，通常依靠着复杂的过程，而这些过程并非由任何人明确设计。我将进一步指出：未能深入思考如何让 AI 与现有的组织超级智能协同工作，正是我们至今尚未看到 AI 对科学研究或经济生产力产生重大影响的主要原因，尽管 AI 的能力已经达到了很高的水平。

Samuel Hammond 🦉 @hamandcheese

19h

回忆起人们过去常说一些愚蠢的话，比如"我们已经有了超级智能，它们就叫公司。" 是的，谁能忘记10月那个命运之日，Dicks Sporting Goods 一次性向世界发布了数十项值得菲尔兹奖的数学发现。

2026年10月8日下午12:45 · · 22.7K 次浏览 75 49 497 97