Hesam(@Hesamation)
returning to Claude Code after 6 months is a whole different experience. some thoughts: > Opus 5.5 is ridiculously efficient. I’ve milked it all week on long tasks (extra effort) and still burned just 50% of weekly usage (Max 20x plan) > ultracode is crazy. it was able to find the root cause of a memory leak that Astra couldn’t. for investigations, it’s literally unmatched. > i don’t suggest ultracode for implementations though, it’s a long long nightmare. > the agents messaging each other makes things
6.4内容质量

TL;DR · AI 摘要
ℏεsam on X: "returning to Claude Code after 6 months is a whole different experience. some thoughts: Opus 5.5 is ridicul...
核心要点
- 主题聚焦:returning to Claude Code after 6 months is a who
- 来源:Hesam(@Hesamation),建议结合原文判断细节。
- AI 分析暂不可用,本条为保底评分与摘要。
#AI#编程
打开原文ℏεsam on X: "时隔6个月再次使用Claude Code,体验完全不同。一些想法: > Opus 5.5的效率令人震惊。我整周都在用它处理耗时任务(额外努力),但每周使用量仅消耗了50%(Max 20x计划) > Ultracode太强大了。它成功定位了Astra无法发现的内存泄漏根源。在调查分析方面,这简直是无与伦比 > 不过我不建议用Ultracode做实际开发,那简直是漫长而痛苦的噩梦 > 代理系统之间的互相对话让使用体验变得非常友好。我真的很喜欢这个功能 > Claude Code应用发生了很大变化。就多任务处理能力而言,我认为它甚至超过了Codex。不过标签切换功能仍有改进空间 > 我仍然更喜欢Codex的电脑端使用体验
11:55 PM · Oct 10, 2026
·
4,365
Views
16
79
11 / X
ℏεsam
@Hesamation